full-disclosure - Fwd: Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3F417493.1070209@well.com>
From: caferace at well.com (Jim Race)
Subject: Fwd: Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables
 w/o Source

I think anyone that has a 79 line .sig shouldn't have email.

-jim

Stephen Clowater wrote:
 > Personally,I think FD should bounce back any message with a binary
 >  attachement to the poster. This is not a 0day exploit list, if you cant
 >  compile it yourself, you shouldnt have the binary :)