full-disclosure - Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12962.62.6.250.109.1061538354.squirrel@www.rootjuice.co.uk>
From: jim at rootjuice.co.uk (Jim Quantrell)
Subject: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!

I vote for number 1.

... or as second choice, number 2.

> My vote is for number two, to shorten to HD or to have nothing at all...
>
> Are two votes allowed???
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Cappuccio [mailto:chris@...dia.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:43 AM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!
>
> Hey folks,
>
> ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE AS TO HOW
> THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO CONTINUE OPERATING.
>
> The subject header is going to change.
>
> This is a survey to see whether people want:
>
> 1. To have no subject prefix, that is, we remove [Full-Disclosure]
> or
> 2. To shorten the subject prefix from [Full-Disclosure] to [FD]
> or
> 3. Do nothing
>
> 1. The first choice is preferable for me and, I would hope, for most
> folks.
> Len says he didn't really want it when he started the list anyways.  So
> we are
> actually going to change it now.
>
> 2. Choice two may be preferable for people who can only filter their
> incoming
> messages based on the subject prefix.  So, if you WANT there to continue
> to be a subject prefix, SPEAK UP!!!
>
> 3. Choice three sucks and if anyone wants this SPEAK UP so we know just
> how many people want this.  This is the least preferrable as it clutters
> the Subject header and makes the list harder to read through for those
> of us
> using a text based e-mail client.
>
> For those of you using procmail or a compatible filter, a good match
> for Full-Disclosure that relies on headers you will always see in
> list messages goes like this:
>
> :0:
> * ^Sender.*full-disclosure-admin@...ts\.netsys\.com
> full-disclosure
>
> That matches this header:
>
> Sender: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
>
> Alternately, you can tell your Pegasus/Mozilla/Outlook/OE/Whatever
> to match on this header.
>
> --
> Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit -- Seneca
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>