lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F4DF61A.10991.9D10307C@localhost>
From: nick at virus-l.demon.co.uk (Nick FitzGerald)
Subject: GOOD: A legal fix for software flaws?

levinson_k@...pammed.com wrote:

<<snip good stuff>>
> Would this kind of legal liability for software manufacturers have a
> chilling effect towards small mom and pop software shops?  Would it halt
> smaller companies like Foundstone and Eeye.com from writing and releasing
> freeware utilities?  Would OpenBSD, Linux distros, etc. also be sued? 
> Would end users like you or me start being sued for becoming infected? 
> Can you know for sure what would happen if this came to pass?  Targeting
> Microsoft may sound attractive to some, but this kind of legislation could
> make every software author a target, while not necessarily doing anything
> to get rid of security issues like worms.

So, at least allow the liability up to the (reatail) cost of 
"licensing" ("purchasing", etc) of the faulty software.

That way commercial developers will have a greater incentive to "do the 
right thing" by their customers than they clearly do now.  Or they will 
shut up shop or go freeware (where other incentives should favour the 
open-source over closed source "solutions" -- with open source at least 
you can have a hope of getting old/abandoned/etc code fixed).


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ