lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01a101c37255$4c7ccda0$550ffea9@rms>
From: rms at computerbytesman.com (Richard M. Smith)
Subject: Bill Gates blames the victim

Hi Robert,

   >>> As long as the patch is ahead of the virus, where
   >>> does the accountability really fall?

I'm curious about one thing.  How is the typical home PC user who runs
Microsoft Office suppose to learn that they now need to download a patch
to fix this latest critical security hole in Microsoft Word:

   http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-035.asp
   Flaw in Microsoft Word Could Enable Macros to Run Automatically
(827653)
   Originally posted: September 03, 2003

BTW, I tried downloading all of the security patches for my copy of
Office XP the other day but couldn't.  The update procedure requires the
original Office XP CDs which are 150 miles away at my other house.

For 3 or 4 years now, I've been asking Microsoft for a simple option in
Word to turn off Word Macros since I don't use them.  If this option
existed, these ongoing security holes with Word Macros wouldn't affect
me.  Any idea why Microsoft refuses to implement this rather obvious and
useful security feature?

Richard


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ