full-disclosure - Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28915501A44DBA4587FE1019D675F983093C91@grfint.intern.adiscon.com>
From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards)
Subject: Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft

> Remember, I am talking straight American law (as *I* 
                                  ^^^^^^^^
That's the point. Law in the US and Europe is *very* different in these
cases. While I do not agree that the EULA is worthless in Europe, the
vendor is definitely much more limited in what it may contain (or it
goes void, at least in part).

Be careful telling somebody he doesn't understand the law if he is
talking about a foreign law system ;)

Rainer