| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20030922192352.GA27337@trusteddebian.org> From: peter at trusteddebian.org (Peter Busser) Subject: Is Marty Lying? Hi! > > 3) Why the fuck do people still thing signature-based IDS is worthwhile? > Give us another solution. Are you saying anomoly based ids signatures are > _worthwhile_? The problem with IDS systems is the same problem that currently available virus scanners have: They work reactive and not proactive. Making machines harder to break into and improve ways to enforce a security policy (e.g. by using Mandatory Access Control (MAC)) would be one way to proactively deal with security. Groetjes, Peter Busser -- The Adamantix Project Taking trustworthy software out of the labs, and into the real world http://www.adamantix.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists