full-disclosure - New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88747FE2-EDD8-11D7-BEBF-000A95864792@joshie.com>
From: jlevitsk at joshie.com (Joshua Levitsky)
Subject: New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

On Sep 23, 2003, at 4:48 AM, Andreas Marx wrote:

> The official Phrack website and the only website you can trust is 
> http://www.phrack.org/ !!!
>
> And the last official release is "* 2003/08/13 - PHRACK #61 IS OUT *"
>
> There is not Phrack 62 available yet. All people who claim that Phrack 
> 62 is out are cheaters. Look at the e-mail addresses of these posters 
> to this mailing list -- they do not use the "official" ones, so don't 
> trust their postings.

Would be nice if they used a PGP / GPG key. Would make it easy then if 
they signed the documents. Then if the documents were tampered, or not 
official then it would be reflected by the signature not matching or 
the key not being right. Then nobody could say anything about a Phrack 
being valid or not. Might make things easier and make for less arguing.

-Josh