lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309241031450.18452-100000@host49.duncable.cust.sover.net>
From: bruen at coldrain.net (Stormwalker)
Subject: Verisign "responds"


Hi Jonathan,

   While I do not disagree with your conclusion, your sense of
   history is a bit off base. Lots of people expected the net
   to be even bigger than it is today (like an several addresses per 
   person on the planet, coke machines and even light switches).  
   
   The government agency was intended for the start up. Sometimes
   they are they only means to get something off the ground.

   Many of us expected that once commercial interests got involved the 
   net we knew would be trashed. This action by Verisign is simply a 
   prophecy come true, as is the DMCA, etc. It's unfortunate that the 
   majority of net users are recent arrivals and do not really know what 
   happened. It will get worse before it gets better. 

   Suggestion: Read "Ruling the Waves" by Deborah  Spar to get a real 
   sense of the history of technology, business and government.

                  cheers, bob 
                  (from the era of punch 
                  cards and paper tape)
    

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote:
> To be "fair" to everyone, the community should be in control of the
> top-level domains, and not commercial organizations - nobody ever
> expected the Internet to grow so huge (not even Al Gore).  So initially
> having a government-run agency was a good temporary solution, but now
> that everything is commercialized, we need to fix what's broken...and
> what's broken is the monopoly on TLDs.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ