full-disclosure - [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871080DEC5874D41B4E3AFC5C400611E03F60BDC@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rodrigo Barbosa [mailto:rodrigob@...spammers.org] 
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:49 AM
> To: Curt Purdy
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] CyberInsecurity: 
> The cost of Monopoly
> 
> 
> As I said, I also think that Micro$oft is as insecure as my 8 
> y/o daughter playing with a handgun.
> 
Your daughter wouldn't be insecure playing with a handgun if she had had
proper handgun safety training.  Wouldn't the same be true of computer
users?

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/