full-disclosure - [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1064942764.4250.7.camel@tesuji.nac.uci.edu>
From: strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu (Dan Stromberg)
Subject: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of
	Monopoly

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 18:30, Bruce Ediger wrote:
> Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> > > As I said, I also think that Micro$oft is as insecure as my 8
> > > y/o daughter playing with a handgun.
> 
> And then, On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Schmehl, Paul L replied:
> > Your daughter wouldn't be insecure playing with a handgun if she had had
> > proper handgun safety training.  Wouldn't the same be true of computer
> > users?
> 
> I realize you're from Texas and everything, but are you nuts?
> An 8-year old with a handgun should cause vast feelings of insecurity
> in you, with or without proper training on her part.

On 20-20 or 60 minutes or something a while back, I saw a bunch of kids
on camera, in a gun safety class, who didn't know they were on camera. 
They were pointing guns at each other, and pulling triggers, and saying
"bang" like it was a toy.

-- 
Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI <strombrg@....nac.uci.edu>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030930/9bfe67b9/attachment.bin