full-disclosure - More on Dan Geer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309301259020.30075-100000@host49.duncable.cust.sover.net>
From: bruen at coldrain.net (Stormwalker)
Subject: More on Dan Geer

 I know the difference between individuals and corporate, but
 if the individuals go along with corporate, then their silence
 is tacit agreement with corporate.

                  cheers, bob

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, madsaxon wrote:

> At 10:18 AM 9/30/03 -0400, Stormwalker wrote:
> 
> >The following quotes clarify @Stake's position. It's worse than even I
> >thought. They know better, but don't care anymore. M$ is more important
> >than truth.
> 
> Perhaps. I caution you, however, to make a distinction between
> @Stake as a corporate entity and some of the individual employees
> thereof.
> 
> m5x
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>