lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F857761.5080601@uberhip.com>
From: godber at uberhip.com (Austin Godber)
Subject: Do you really think CDs will be protected in
 future?

Dave Howe wrote:
> Davide Del Vecchio wrote:
> 
>>I don`t know what you think about this, but in my opinion
>>will never exist a method to REALLY protect CDs, just because
>>I think that "if I can ear it, I can reproduce (and record) it".
> 
> There will never be a point where you can't make an analogue copy by
> simply recording the output.
> What the RIAA are afraid of is *digital* copies where each copy is as good
> if not better than the original. If they can make it impossible to "rip" a

However, if when you make the first generation recording from output you then 
save it in a digital format without DRM you only suffer copy degeneration on the 
first recording ... once you have the non DRM digital copy you can copy at will.

Austin


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ