[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1067357862.716.14.camel@localhost>
From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: Is bugtraq even worth it anymore?
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 07:27, Rob Lewis wrote:
> I unsubscribed to BUGTRAQ months ago and then subscribed to the respective
> company's security advisories that I want to recieve and it appears that
> over the last 6 months or so I am getting the same info the company is
> putting out, only I get it 3-5 days sooner than BUGTRAQ.
While that is certainly a solution for BugTraq, other SF sponsored lists
are hurting bad as well. My main concern is the Incidents list. It can
not be tolerated that discussions/warnings about incidents occur days
after the incident actually happened.
Is anyone aware of a "replacement list" for Incidents that is more
timely?
Thanks,
Frank
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031028/eedc4a2a/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists