full-disclosure - [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20031030124837.GY15785@skywalker.bsws.de>
From: hb-fulldisclosure at bsws.de (Henning Brauer)
Subject: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:32:37PM -0500, Curt Purdy wrote:
> This is the reason open-source is inherently more secure.

well, maybe, but in absolute terms often still poor. often, not always.

> (you think IBM recommended Linux without going over every single line of
> code?)

yes.

-- 
Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
hb@...s.de - henning@...nbsd.org
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)