full-disclosure - W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1979382312.20031031001147@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
From: 3APA3A at SECURITY.NNOV.RU (3APA3A)
Subject: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs

Dear Sergey V. Gordeychik,

There  are  more  ways  to  stop  GPs  from  applying.  For  example see
http://www.security.nnov.ru/search/news.asp?binid=1613

--Wednesday, October 29, 2003, 5:48:01 PM, you wrote to security@...m.dyndns.org:

SVG> So, I got an idea.
SVG> Everybody, who can drop pings, or SMB commutations, from his local
SVG> machine to DC can prevent GPO updates!
SVG> User can use IPSec policy (sic!) to do it :-)
SVG> So, Laura right :-)
SVG> And I'm wrong :-(

SVG> _______________________________________________
SVG> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
SVG> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

-- 
~/ZARAZA
?? ? ? ?????, ??????, ??????? ?????? - ????? ??????
??? ????? ??????? ????????, ?????? ???????. (????)