[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200311041323.28778.jeremiah@nur.net>
From: jeremiah at nur.net (Jeremiah Cornelius)
Subject: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 06:18, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:51:09 MST, Michael Gale said:
>
>
> > Oh -- did I mention that slackware is the most Unix like distro
> > available.
There is a reason that hotmail is running on FreeBSD and NOT
> > Red Hat
>
>
> Who owns Hotmail?
>
> Who is the biggest opponent of the GPL?
>
> Who'd prefer not being caught dead running a GPL system, and look for ANY
> alternative if their own operating system wasn't scalable to the task,
> even
if it wasn't technically the best choice?
>
> Remember, businesses make decisions for lots of reasons other than sheer
> technical merit. Often, political/perception issues count for more....
>
The FreeBSD decision was made in the years BEFORE MS bought them. It's a
legacy MS has tried - with mixed success - to replace with W2K/ASP.
I beleieve the original Hotmail engineers were inspired by the use of BSD at
Yahoo!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/qBjOJi2cv3XsiSARAnf6AKDRX9Xk/zcaPo4tZaRkP2lwxnJVFwCg5oI5
MyIF7X82/Qx9rVd9caA9C8o=
=1BGs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists