[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200311042138.hA4LcJLg006558@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:23:26 PST, Jeremiah Cornelius said:
> The FreeBSD decision was made in the years BEFORE MS bought them. It's a
> legacy MS has tried - with mixed success - to replace with W2K/ASP.
My point still stands - if the original systems had been Linux, MS would
have moved them to a *BSD *anyhow*.
OK? *REGARDLESS* of the technical merits, Microsoft would pick a *BSD over a
Linux solution because of the *licensing* involved. Getting caught using GPL
software after what they've said about the GPL would be like Rush Limbaugh
getting busted for drugs after all the anti-drug stuff he's said.. Oh wait.. :)
Remember - they're the company that just fired somebody because he took
pics of Mac G5's being delivered at their corporate offices. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031104/867ef7c8/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists