full-disclosure - Feeding Stray Cats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a0b01c3a7a5$a3d7d7e0$c71121c2@exchange.sharpuk.co.uk>
From: DaveHowe at cmn.sharp-uk.co.uk (Dave Howe)
Subject: Feeding Stray Cats

> One way to solve this could be to split this list into two;
> one moderated and one un-moderated. All mail gets sent to the
> un-moderated list, to avoid the suspicions of censorship that
> makes this list different from bugtraq, and those mail that
> pass moderation, or is sent from someone who is known from
> previous posts to be serious, will also be sent to the moderated
> list.
Note that at least one other list (the cypherpunks) use a two-pass
system - the main list is a "raw" unmoderated, multinode list but there
are available "moderated" nodes which take the raw list and pass it though
moderation - so you can choose either raw access, or a selection of
different moderators (whichever suits your style/preferences best)
depending on which node you subscribe to.
Perhaps someone could create a similar scheme - subscribe, then offer a
moderated "view" of the list for those who would appreciate that - as a
value added service.