lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE8C09E52C2D294B93B3F69CAC9A76AF3B42FF@livewire.esri.com>
From: aclendenen at esri.com (Anthony Clendenen)
Subject: Feeding Stray Cats

Delete key works well also...

-Anthony
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Schmehl, Paul L [mailto:pauls@...allas.edu] 
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:51 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Feeding Stray Cats

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
> Kenneth Ekdahl
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 4:38 AM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Feeding Stray Cats
> 
> One way to solve this could be to split this list into two; 
> one moderated and one un-moderated. All mail gets sent to the 
> un-moderated list, to avoid the suspicions of censorship that 
> makes this list different from bugtraq, and those mail that 
> pass moderation, or is sent from someone who is known from 
> previous posts to be serious, will also be sent to the moderated list.
> 
One of the wonderous things about computing is the distributed nature of
it.  By spreading the work across many hands, the job is easy to do.
Yet, what you are suggesting is that Len et. al. do all the work, while
the people who get bugged by certain posts do none.

A much better suggestion would be, "Learn how to use filters".  The
people subscribed to this list are *assumed* to have at least a
tangential interest in security.  Given that, one would *think* that
they have at least enough capability to set up a simple mail filter
(pick your poison, your choice of OS) that would eliminate the noise and
still give them what they want.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ