full-disclosure - defense against session hijacking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20031117225139.GA16263@0dayspray.com>
From: dave at 0dayspray.com (David Maynor)
Subject: defense against session hijacking

On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:44:24PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake David Maynor (dave@...yspray.com) [17/11/03 17:30]:
> > This would break things like NATed machines and such.
> 
> Could you explain how, please?
> 
> If machine A gets NATed to firewall B, and webserver C gets the session...
> It's going to record the address of firewall B, not machine A.  I fail to
> see how using the connection source's IP address would break NAT.*  And I
> don't know what you mean by 'and such'.
> 
You assume a straight 1 to 1 natting, that is not always the case.