full-disclosure - atrticle in: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 5, NO. 93, December 19, 2003

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0312211235210.8314-100000@stratigery.local>
From: eballen1 at qwest.net (Bruce Ediger)
Subject: atrticle in:  Security Wire Perspectives, Vol.
 5, NO. 93, December 19, 2003

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Ron DuFresne wrote:

> after the @stake recent actions, to be focused these days upon
> avoiding mentioning the shortcomings from redmond.  Are others reading the
> same these days?

Absolutely.  After the initial stir that Geer/Scheiener et al's anti-
monoculture broadside raised, all the trade rags have run "balanced"
articles designed to soothe CIOs who have all-MSFT shops.

I'm all in favor of balanced journalism, but sometimes you can't balance
or compromise.

I recall reading this little parable:

Two childred argue about how to split a cookie:

Child A says that he/she/it should get all of the cookie.
Child B says that they should cut the cookie in half, and A and B
should each get half.

Adult C steps in and compromises, by splitting the difference:
Child A gets 3/4 of the cookie and Child B gets 1/4.

Sometimes "balance" or "fairness" just doesn't work.