[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <033401c3dc6a$96ec2b90$1214dd80@corp.emc.com>
From: exibar at thelair.com (Exibar)
Subject: Re: January 15 is Personal Firewall Day, help the cause
sheesh,
Linux in the wild viruses that come to mind: Scalper, Ramen, Lion,
Simile..... I'm sure there are lots more as well.
Linux is NOT immune to viruses or worms, plain and simple.
Just because the number of Linux viruses/worms are much smaller than W32
viruses/worms doesn't mean that they don't exist. The number of Linux
installs are much smaller than W32 installs as well. If I was a Vx'r would
I write a Linux virus that would max out at 500,000 computers to infect, or
would I write a W32 virus that would max out at 50,000,000 + computers to
infect worldwide. W32 has, what, 92% of the computer desktops someone
mentioned? That's a heck of a lot of bang for the Vx'r buck!
Exibar
----- Original Message -----
From: "David F. Skoll" <dfs@...ringpenguin.com>
To: "Exibar" <exibar@...lair.com>
Cc: <tlarholm@...x.com>; <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: January 15 is Personal Firewall Day, help
the cause
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Exibar wrote:
>
> > Will any of these do? Will you still think you don't need AV on Linux
now?
> > here's a partial list..... don't choke too hard now!
>
> Those are all proof-of-concept. I'm unaware of a single production
> Linux machine anywhere in the world succumbing to one of them. Perhaps
> you can provide evidence to the contrary?
>
> Furthermore, most of them are not self-propagating, but require active
> cooperation from the recipient.
>
> I do not need nor use AV on Linux.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists