full-disclosure - another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: mescsa at yahoo.com (mescsa)
Subject: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch

Nick FitzGerald wrote:
> I don't know what you've been
> smoking/drinking/whatever, but get off it 
> and go read the relevant RFCs -- 1945 & 2616.  Do
> _NOT_ be misled by 
> RFC 2396 -- it is relevant, but largely for the
> parts of a URI's 
> general form that are specifically negated in the
> other RFCs.

Can you give any hint where to find this vital
information within RFC 2616? I'm misled, too.

Thank you
mescsa

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html