| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BAY0-SMTP09pY8IDVCR00005c31@BAY0-SMTP09.bay0.hotmail.com> From: freouwebbe at msn.com (roberta bragg) Subject: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) MCP is not a Microsoft owned publication. If someone wishes to write an essay it will be published on Monday in Security Watch, a newsletter provided by the same parent company as MCP Magazine --- 101 Communications. They have a JAVA publication, a couple for the Feds, some for education market. In short a bunch of IT related publications. http://www.101communications.com/ I will respond on Wednesday. Not for Microsoft. I am not an employee of Microsoft. Nor am I an employee of MCP magazine nor of 101 communications. I will respond to what the writer on Monday says. If I agree,,, I'll champion their point. If I don't I'll argue against it. But it will be my opinion. Just as the author of Monday's essay will give their opinion. I rather suspect that I'll agree with some things and disagree with others. But I can't do either, if no one writes. And I repeat, if someone writes,, it'll get published. Again, here is your opportunity to express your opinion in a forum that is different from this one. I've read a lot in here that I think others should hear. Some I agree with and some I don't, but it should be heard. It should be available elsewhere. Here's an opportunity to do that. If you believe that Security Watch is a pro-Microsoft publication -- then here's your opportunity to publish something anti-Microsoft in a pro- Microsoft publication.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists