lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <40438A1A.4060003@onryou.com> From: cory at onryou.com (Cory Donnelly) Subject: Re: Security Watch Essay Cael Abal wrote: > roberta bragg wrote: > | Here's an opportunity to be heard by a number of security interested > | people, many of whom, don't subscribe to this list: > > Just a heads-up to anyone considering responding to this call for > submissions: > > The 'MCP' in 'MCP Magazine' stands for 'Microsoft Certified > Professional'. The blurb next to the first News entry found at > http://www.mcpmag.com/security/ says this: > > "Microsoft Beefs up Online Security Offerings > Perhaps no company in the industry is working harder than Microsoft at > making sure the public knows what steps to take to secure its products." Yet another heads-up -- essays by Robert Michael Slade and Martin Levasseur made it into the MCP Mag newsletter entitled 'Security Watch: The Microsoft Security Debate -- Part One'. http://www.mcpmag.com/newsletter/article.asp?EditorialsID=260 Roberta's response is late -- Keith Ward said he'd post it February 23. I wonder if he decided to postpone it because of Aucsmith's "We have never had vulnerabilities exploited before the patch was known," comment? The BBC article doesn't say exactly when that keynote speech was made. Heh. I'd be pretty embarassed too. Ward said: "[S]o much criticism of Redmond on the topic of security is, I believe, ill-informed." C
Powered by blists - more mailing lists