lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <733820000.1079714888@utd49554.utdallas.edu> From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Paul Schmehl) Subject: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? --On Friday, March 19, 2004 10:15:06 AM +0000 Random Letters <randomisedletters@...mail.com> wrote: > <opinion> > > The only way to 100% secure a Windows client machine is to take it away > from the user and lock it in a cupboard. > [snipped a bunch in the middle. > > If Windows was 100% secure, why bother at all with patches and virus > updates? Write this on the chalkboard 100 times. "Nothing is 100% secure! Nothing is 100% secure! Nothing is 100% secure!" Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists