| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200403191810.i2JIAgie008924@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Re: Administrivia On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:46:43 +0100, Spiro Trikaliotis <trik-news@....de> said: > Isn't that the reason why there is a Mail-Followup-To (MFT) header > (http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html)? With this, the sender of a mail > can decide if he wants a copy of the mail or not. This would be a lot more widely supported if it was an IETF RFC rather than just something on one guy's webpage. Yes, it may be a good idea, but it's still just one guy's proposal, and as such it's hard to get traction with commercial MUA vendors.... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040319/1366bbbe/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists