full-disclosure - Re: Administrivia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <405A480D.1020205@brvenik.com>
From: security at brvenik.com (Jason)
Subject: Re: Administrivia

Nick FitzGerald wrote:

> John.Airey@...b.org.uk wrote:
> 
> 
>>And please guys, stop cc'ing me. I'm on the list and have been almost
>>since it started!
> 
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> First, it is actually _rude_ to CC responses to messages from "self-
> moderating" lists (such as Full-Disclosure) to the poster and the list 
> because, by definition, the poster is on the list and will see your 
> reply.
> 

Perhaps a read over RFC 1855 would be in order for a few?

ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1855.txt

but *I* prefer to be in the recipient list if I have joined in on the 
discussion, it is clearly a discussion I am interested in or felt like 
chiming in on. I have filters... they filter... they filter differently 
if I am a named to or cc... discussions I am participating in by default 
float to my attention.

tis all I have to say

+++ath0 :-)