lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.2.20040318174345.050b8480@pop3.direcway.com> From: madsaxon at direcway.com (madsaxon) Subject: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) At 11:40 AM 3/19/2004 +1300, Nick FitzGerald wrote: >Also, when sending messages to multiple lists (say F-D and Bugtraq), it >seems you may slightly reduce the multiple message spew that often >results on F-D because of the above by putting all the addresses in the >To: header, rather than one in the To: and the other(s) in CC:. Why is that, do you think? m5x
Powered by blists - more mailing lists