full-disclosure - Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? )

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.2.20040318174345.050b8480@pop3.direcway.com>
From: madsaxon at direcway.com (madsaxon)
Subject: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft  Security,
 baby steps ? )

At 11:40 AM 3/19/2004 +1300, Nick FitzGerald wrote:

>Also, when sending messages to multiple lists (say F-D and Bugtraq), it
>seems you may slightly reduce the multiple message spew that often
>results on F-D because of the above by putting all the addresses in the
>To: header, rather than one in the To: and the other(s) in CC:.

Why is that, do you think?

m5x