full-disclosure - viruses being sent to this list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <405FC1B0.2030307@egotistical.reprehensible.net>
From: ge at egotistical.reprehensible.net (Gadi Evron)
Subject: viruses being sent to this list

MICHAEL coles wrote:

> Dookie,
> 
>     There is a very fine line between uber-troll and not understanding
> the topic. What makes you think that your email wasn't found on one of
> the resting places for this mailing list? You name appears over three
> hundred times according to google.com when searching for "full
> disclosure". 

As I wrote in my original email.. either pre-meditated or "0wned". I 
letter re-clarified that issue.
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=ge%40egotistical.reprehensible.net%3E+%22full+disclosure%22&btnG=Google+Search
> 
> You weren't targetted, just unlucky.

Most likely. Poor choice of words on my part mentioning "0wned" second, 
but I rectified that many times over now. Let's move to the subject at 
hand, shall we?

> There is not much the mods can do. Want them  to request that your email
> addresses be removed from all search engines and private mailing lists
> around?

And that is relevant to the list's charter being in breach and the list 
becoming a petri-dish for viruses, allowed to pass through this 
community to thousands, how?

As you mention yourselves, viruses are not sent from users, so why 
should they be allowed under "full disclosure" or "freedom of speech"?

	Gadi.