full-disclosure - Signal to Noise Ratio for February

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200403252231.i2PMVL5Y008288@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Signal to Noise Ratio for February 

On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:50:45 EST, "Ng, Kenneth (US)" said:
> I'd like to know how low the bit rate had to be to lock onto a signal that
> low.  :-) 

I don't have a cite handy, but I believe it was on the order of 5 bits/second.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040325/ee937462/attachment.bin