full-disclosure - Wiretap or Magic Lantern?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <407409CD.1040709@onryou.com>
From: lists2 at onryou.com (Cael Abal)
Subject: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

| 2., The terrorsts are not stupid, they use strong encryption and there
| is proof that PGP repels NSA.

Hi Tamas,

Although I agree with some of your post, I have to take exception to
this point.  What proof are you referring to?  All conspiracy theories
aside, it's silly to assume that the good guys have approximately the
same levels of technology, knowledge and resources as the bad guys.

Myself, I'll wait until I'm given a tour of the NSA's secret underground
bunkers before I make any claims as to what the NSA can and cannot do.  :)

Cael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFAdAnNR2vQ2HfQHfsRAjvOAJ9hBAzHT4CYsJ+kYy1/CDx5rAQEWwCghjcw
R3frpGXlvwhlSORC/jLJaTw=
=hvt0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----