full-disclosure - Wiretap or Magic Lantern?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: fulldisc at ultratux.org (Maarten)
Subject: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?

On Wednesday 07 April 2004 14:12, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> Hello all,

<snip other good stuff>

> BTW as for some of the myths that accompany these covert ops in
> cyberspace: you would be really surprised to learn how sophisticated
> criminals have already been caught simply by sending them HTML email
> that contained an invisible web bug, the kind that is in your spam every
> day. It is mostly still the human factor, that gives one away, there is
> mostly no need to go head-on against really strong crypto or stego.
> Approach it from the human side and you are there much faster.
>
> BTW as for the "NSA-proof"-nes of PGP: It is not uncrackable. Nothing
> is, given the right amount of time and resources on your hands. The only
> question is, does it need to be? And is it worth it? If you can get at
> the info in say 10,000 years from now than clearly this is not an
> option. And there is no need to go there either, when all you need is
> some attractive woman and many men will readily tell more than you had
> ever hoped for. :-P

[ /. mode on ]

Mod +5 Insightful

[ /. mode off ]

-- 
Linux: Because rebooting is for adding hardware.