lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: geggam692000 at (D B)
Subject: Wireless legal to eavesdrop

I have been reading and am wanting some other

( this does pertain only to the US .. my apologies to
those outside )


(g) It shall not be unlawful under this chapter or
chapter 121 of this title for any person--

    (i) to intercept or access an electronic
communication made through an electronic communication
system that is configured so that such electronic
communication is readily accessible to the general

    (ii) to intercept any radio communication which is

    (I) by any station for the use of the general
public, or that relates to ships, aircraft, vehicles,
or persons in distress;

    (II) by any governmental, law enforcement, civil
defense, private land mobile, or public safety
communications system, including police and fire,
readily accessible to the general public;

    (III) by a station operating on an authorized
frequency within the bands allocated to the amateur,
citizens band, or general mobile radio services; or


part III of the above pertains to the bottom 6
channels of wireless. ( channels 1 - 6 are in the
amateur radio spectrum )

Does this mean if someone is not using WEP on those
channels all their information is as open as something
I pick up on the police scanner ?

opinions ?

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25

Powered by blists - more mailing lists