full-disclosure - Wireless ISPs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <95233728.1084299253@[192.168.1.206]>
From: jworkman at pimpworks.org (Jeff Workman)
Subject: Wireless ISPs

--On Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:26 PM -0700 "Schmidt, Michael R." 
<Michael.Schmidt@...obile.com> wrote:

> In some states it is illegal to intercept any communication without both
> parties knowledge.  This is true of wired or wireless communications.  Be
> it a chat session or an online order process.  In the state of Washington
> (my home state) intercepting this communication could be a felony.  So at
> least we have that

AFAIK using credit card information fraudulently is a felony regardless of 
the legality of the method used to obtain such information.  Since credit 
card fraud is illegal and it still doesn't discourage some people from 
practicing it, why would making the means of obtaining it illegal 
discourage it?  Sure it adds one more charge on the prospective felon's rap 
sheet if/when they do get caught, but do they really care? I think not.

-J

--
Jeff Workman | http://www.pimpworks.org/nigritude-ultramarine.html