full-disclosure - Support the Sasser-author fund started

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1084475266.1790.8.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net>
From: blancher at cartel-securite.fr (Cedric Blancher)
Subject: Support the Sasser-author fund started

Le jeu 13/05/2004 ? 18:17, Aaron Gee-Clough a ?crit :
> Duquette, John wrote:
> > Why not punish all the admins/users who failed to patch their systems in
> > time as well.  
> Because they didn't break the law.  It's really that simple. 

In France, there's a law that says you have to furnish available means
to appropriatly protect systems that personnal datas (names, addresses,
telephone numbers, CC numbers, etc.). However, it is not strict, so you
can justify a patch delay for validation means or anything else that
obviously prevent you to patch, in particular if you can produce a
workaround.

But doing nothing at all (no patch, no workaround) simply break the law.

-- 
http://www.netexit.com/~sid/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
>> Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!