[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200405140216.i4E2GDKL003114@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Support the Sasser-author fund started
On Thu, 13 May 2004 14:28:10 EDT, Poof said:
> By not patching your system you're leaving yourself open to exploit and the
> danger of having your machine attacking another machine.
>
> Now- If a person doesn't get something fixed that they know exists and can
> avoid an 'accident' then they are indirectly responsible.
Your baby seat analogy is flawed. In this case, you're having to make the
decision between not pulling the car *entirely* off onto the shoulder when you
have a mechanical breakdown, and risking being hit by another car - or pulling
all the way onto that shoulder that looks like it's rather soft and crumbly and
likely to spill your car into the ravine.
(We actually had a case of that locally just a few weeks ago - a school bus
going down one of the dirt roads around here went off the side.. then a dump
truck coming down the road *also* went off the side just a few yards after
passing the bus.. It was believed that in both cases, the soft shoulder
contributed to the vehicle's sliding sideways and ending up on their sides...)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040513/35102375/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists