full-disclosure - Fw: Sasser author

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com (William Warren)
Subject: Fw: Sasser author

any firewall even the one inside xp would have stopped sasser and you 
would have been able to patch at your leisure.

Paolo Mattiangeli wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paolo Mattiangeli" <pamatt@...trodiascolto.it>
> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 5:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sasser author
> 
> 
> 
>>I am responsible for security in a small business' network (50-or-so
>>machines, most of them running MS OSs). I have been aware of MSS bulletins
>>as soon as they where out, and made sure to apply patches as specified.
>>Sasser did nothing to my offices' network. But, on the other hand, I have
> 
> a
> 
>>single PC at home, one I don't use very much, and I often forget to deal
>>with security patches on that machine. Well - would you bet? - I got a
>>Sasser infection at home, which caused me the discomfort of a late-night
>>session of cleaning, disinfeting, patching and do on. I put the blame on
> 
> me,
> 
>>of course. But sure I could have spent that night doing something better,
>>chat-cheating the wife, reading a book, going to the movies and so on. So
> 
> my
> 
>>question is: what wrong did al this do to The Microsoft BEAST? It only did
>>some wrong to me and my personal life. I could have avoided that, but
> 
> can't
> 
>>I feel safe at home? Should I be satisfied at thinking that this guy is a
>>"social naive" whith no conscience of the consequences of his acts? Isn't
>>this what the law is meant for, to protect citizens and business from the
>>consequences of other people's acts?
>>
>>Just another 0.02 worth comment in this thread, that is going stale IMO...
>>
>>Paolo Mattiangeli
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

-- 
My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17  No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and 
every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt 
condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their 
righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.