full-disclosure - Imaging Operating Systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F59A229-AF57-11D8-BB7C-000D93C10E6A@fireburst.co.uk>
From: sam at fireburst.co.uk (Sam Sharpe)
Subject: Imaging Operating Systems

On 26 May 2004, at 19:55, Michael Schaefer wrote:
>
> I keep hearing suggestions about having a "clean image" to transfer 
> onto the computer.
> Is there an official Microsoft way to do this?

two methods:

1) Unattended Install (link is for a CD based version, we do it from a 
network install server)
http://www.pureperformance.com/js/showtip.asp?id=136

2) Install the machine, ghost it with Symantec Ghost, install spyware 
trojans etc and then when you've finished, write over it with a clean 
Ghost image again.
http://www.symantec.com/ghost/

> Is some sort of over the network OS installation script in order here?

We have a complete unattended installation setup for Windows 2000/XP 
that will install every piece of standard software, based on some info 
in our central db about the machine. Walk up to the machine, PXE boot 
it, hit yes a couple of times and then walk away for an hour. Come back 
and you have a complete system. We have something like 17000 machines. 
You probably don't.

> Are there other vendors that do a better job?

For a single machine, Ghost is easier (or for multiple identical 
machines you can use ghost multicast) for a wide variety of hardware 
and installs, the network installation method is better.

--
Sam
sam@...eburst.co.uk