full-disclosure - Re: Internet explorer 6 execution of arbitrary code (An analysis of the 180 Solutions Trojan)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40C6B214.5050702@egotistical.reprehensible.net>
From: ge at egotistical.reprehensible.net (Gadi Evron)
Subject: Re: Internet explorer 6 execution of arbitrary
 code (An analysis of the 180 Solutions Trojan)

As this is FD, I feel like answering.

> Who exactly are you? 

I'm your brother's cousin's uncle's ex-room mate. (I hope I got the 
SpaceBalls quote right).

> You come barreling into FD several months ago, long after it was 
> created. Pissing in your pants to have found a unmoderated new 
> mailing list. You run around on a spree posting every piece 
> drivel at every possible opportunity. You then latch onto 
> bugtraq riding the coat-tails of other peoples message in order 
> to get yours approved. Now I see you have insinuated yourself 
> into the Risks Digest 23.41 with perhaps a record 3 messages in 
> one go.

I have had few communications with you in the past, but unlike other 
people who can ignore, decline or laugh, you get all "my p?n*s* is 
bigger" and act plain rude. What if I told you I have a dog? Can you 
bark louder?

Besides, FD is open for any discussion or anything else. Like you can 
send your flames, I can send whatever I want. I usually refrain from 
doing it unless I see something on-topic which I feel is important, but 
hey... Who am I to dare tell you that you act like an asshole baby who 
didn't get his milk for lunch?

> Somebody spends there time and effort analysing a zero day, you 
> then have the fucking nerve to complain about that:

I appreciate any hard work, and I appreciate Jelmer's work which I 
commented on. I also said that most of his post is about his hate 
towards Thor Larholm (which he admits to). That is not professional.
I did ask for clarifications on the 0-day.

But hey, you know what? You know best.

> <!--  
> Also, please try and keep your grudges to yourself where 50K 
> plus busy people  need to sift through vital information?
> -->
> 
> and then you further demonstrate your cockeyed thought process 
> by thinking Jelmer has given you a moments thought and has 
> also 'dragged personal issues and flames into "the thread"'

He said he did.

> <!--  
> Where Jelmer and I disagree is on dragging  personal issues and 
> flames into the thread.
> -->
> 
> "the thread" being his analysis of the zero day that you stuck 
> your fat face into in the first place.

Who said I'm fat?

> Like I said go start yet 'another' mailing list if you are so 
> desparate for attention. You can be the moderator, the only 
> poster, the king of the hill, everything you want to be. 

Can I have some chocolate too?

	Gadi Evron.