full-disclosure - PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <023001c45f0a$3d4a2ec0$987f013d@c5>
From: aditya.deshmukh at online.gateway.technolabs.net (Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ])
Subject: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior

> You gotta be more specific than FW-1.  FW-1 can run over a large number
> of OS.  You can get FW-1 for WinNT, Solaris, Linux, BSD . Each has the
> strengths and weaknesses of the underlying OS.  Also FW-1 can run on a
> large number of hardware platforms, PCI, Compact-PCI, Sparc, etc.  Each
> has it's strengths and weaknesses.

now you are talking, if you are using BSD how about using Openbsd with the paket filter ?


??????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?b???v?"?.axZ?x??????Gb?*'??.?[kj???.?j)m???r??