full-disclosure - PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200407010402.i6142IcV004278@caligula.anu.edu.au>
From: avalon at caligula.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed)
Subject: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior

> You gotta be more specific than FW-1.  FW-1 can run over a large number
> of OS.  You can get FW-1 for WinNT, Solaris, Linux, BSD . Each has the
> strengths and weaknesses of the underlying OS.  Also FW-1 can run on a
> large number of hardware platforms, PCI, Compact-PCI, Sparc, etc.  Each
> has it's strengths and weaknesses.

I couldn't find the original for this in my inbox but the poster is wrong.

For details on what platforms FW-1 is really supported on, see this
document:

http://www.checkpoint.com/products/downloads/firewall-1_datasheet.pdf

Darren