full-disclosure - iDEFENSE - New Tricks [web censorship!]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: chromazine at sbcglobal.net (Steve Kudlak)
Subject: iDEFENSE - New Tricks [web censorship!]

Well i would prefer people not blowing people up or killing people
but I don't think people should pretty much shit down websites they
don't like. Most people like something like "The First Amendment" until
it makes them uncomfortable then they want limits imposed somehow.
Of course even though I think I could brew up plans for an "assination pen"
I don't think the world needs them at this point.

I have all sorts of "basic rights" stuff released by the Rutherford 
Institute
one being a set of publications using various cute tricks so that you can
do religious things at public schools by routing around the letter of 
the law.
Now what happens if a group of Satanists should do the same thing. It would
seem to me they might be out there screaming "seperation of church and 
state".
Perhaps it is  just some milder alternative religon like "Wicca".. But 
at least I could
write and ask them.

These things sort of all bear watching. This is beyond the usual 
technical details,
but remember the technology has to be used by humans and inflences what 
humans
do. What is one person's cute idea is another's implemtation headache. 
One person's
Fredom of Information is anothers "aiding terrorism".

Have Fun,
Sends Steve

Steve wrote:

> --- Ron DuFresne <dufresne@...ternet.com> wrote: 
>  
>
>>Interesting, yet, so far lacking in any real
>>evidence that Idefense was
>>the force behind their demise.  Is there something
>>other then heresay and
>>conjecture to back up the claim?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Ron DuFresne
>>    
>>
>
>Not been to the http://www.roguesci.org site I take
>it?
>Read the front page then comment.
>
>Regards
>Steve
>
>
>
>	
>	
>		
>___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040812/e8c2cc23/attachment.html