full-disclosure - meta-question about the list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: dveditz at cruzio.com (Daniel Veditz)
Subject: meta-question about the list

Maarten wrote:

> I noticed that this list (-software) unlike many others does not add a 
> "Reply-To: field with the list address there.  This makes replying a wee bit 
> more error-prone since a lot of MUA's will happily reply to the poster 
> instead of the list unless you manually cut&paste the right addresses.
> 
> Is there a special reason this header isn't used ?

"-software"? I received this on full-disclosure. Which list would be put in
the Reply-to header?

See the articles

"Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful"
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

"Reply-To Munging Considered Useful"
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml

-Dan Veditz