full-disclosure - Re: ask apple - was: lame bitching about xpsp2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7742d5500408141817c506cf1@mail.gmail.com>
From: adamsc at gmail.com (Chris Adams)
Subject: Re: ask apple - was: lame bitching about xpsp2

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 09:13:52 +0200, it <fulldis@...m.ath.cx> wrote:
> at this point I'm personally more interested what others think about Mac OSX
> security history ranking among common OSs.
> without using it or having any relationship to apple I've placed it no2 after
> OBSD.

It's not - Apple's developers don't have the same pervasive security
focus that the OpenBSD team has. In general the stuff which comes out
of the Unix/NeXT side of the company tends to show signs of being
developed by people with at least average security awareness; some of
the classic Mac OS stuff has almost child-like naivety. The other
problem is that product-security@...le.com tends to be a black-hole -
the *only* way to get a response from them is to threaten public
disclousure and even a trivial fix will frequently take half a year or
more (they are better about releasing new versions of third-party code
when the upstream is patched).

Chris