full-disclosure - lame bitching about xpsp2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: mvp at joeware.net (joe)
Subject: lame bitching about xpsp2

Did you talk to anyone about the issue you had? I have VS and Borland
compiler environments loaded and am not having an issue. 

As for testing, SP2 was a required update on all regular user machines
inside of MS since RC1. Is everything in the world tested, nope. But they
tested what they could test with something like 40k employees, tens if not
hundreds of thousands of beta testers. Not sure how much more MS could have
done for testing. People were already complaining how long it was taking to
put out. 

So did you beta test it? It was an open beta.

  joe

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Ill will
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:55 AM
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] lame bitching about xpsp2

maybe because we use our computers for other than a simple workstation.. i
couldnt even get visual studio installed tat in itself show microsoft hadnt
tested this shit fully before streaming it to the masses