full-disclosure - lame bitching about xpsp2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E075A187B11EED409B12D00100CAAD661C9C9D@ntserver.meltemi.local>
From: Jos at meltemi.co.uk (Jos Osborne)
Subject: lame bitching about xpsp2

>Release candidates are not beta's. That's why beta's are called beta's
>and releasecandidates releasecandidates.
>
>Eventhough, beta's should already have a certain reliability, since
>beta means: ready for a scheduled releasetime. That is even more so
>for releasecandidates because (yes:) they are releasecandidates.

So they'd be Gamma's?

Jos