full-disclosure - lame bitching about xpsp2 (will it ever sto p ?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88001FC5C453764CA6597FB29874249401C11511@SVEX03.dutchtone.nl>
From: allan.vanleeuwen at orangemail.nl (allan.vanleeuwen@...ngemail.nl)
Subject: lame bitching about xpsp2 (will it ever sto
	p ?)

Official standpoint from M$ on beta/RC naming:

Beta releases do not necessarilly contain same functionality as the final
release RC DOES contain same functionality as final release (no more
functionality changes are planned)

So it's not a question of reliability but functionality ...

Just my 2c

-----Original Message-----
From: Jos Osborne [mailto:Jos@...temi.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:51 PM
To: Raymond; Nick Eoannidis
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] lame bitching about xpsp2

>Release candidates are not beta's. That's why beta's are called beta's 
>and releasecandidates releasecandidates.
>
>Eventhough, beta's should already have a certain reliability, since 
>beta means: ready for a scheduled releasetime. That is even more so for 
>releasecandidates because (yes:) they are releasecandidates.

So they'd be Gamma's?

Jos

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
===========================================================
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is alleen
bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt,
wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te
informeren door het bericht te retourneren. Hoewel Orange maatregelen heeft
genomen om virussen in deze email of attachments te voorkomen, dient u ook
zelf na te gaan of virussen aanwezig zijn aangezien Orange niet
aansprakelijk is voor computervirussen die veroorzaakt zijn door deze
email..

The information contained in this message may be confidential and is
intended to be only for the addressee. Should you receive this message
unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail. Although Orange has taken steps to ensure that
this email and attachments are free from any virus, you do need to verify
the possibility of their existence as Orange can take no responsibility for
any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email.
===========================================================