lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4135CDDA.9050409@paradigmo.com> From: stephane.nasdrovisky at paradigmo.com (stephane nasdrovisky) Subject: New paper on Security and Obscurity This not so new info may bring some lights : http://www.fact-index.com/a/au/auguste_kerckhoffs.html : "... the security of a cryptosystem must depend only on the key, not on the secrecy of any other part of the system." Peter Swire wrote: >?full disclosure? and computer security: > > http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=531782 > > The paper begins by analyzing the >clich? that ?there is no security through obscurity.? It observes that the >traditional military and intelligence clich? is that ?loose lips sink > ships.? > >