[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4135D40A.7040301@paradigmo.com>
From: stephane.nasdrovisky at paradigmo.com (stephane nasdrovisky)
Subject: New paper on Security and Obscurity
Just a stupid tought inspired by page 7 - B: who will create the first
satellite with me (i.e. for watching what's doing our ennemy / in order
to know where he is)? I guess we could earn some $ if we are the first
on this topic, I hope I'm not too late :-)
Is full-disclosure includes password/shared secret disclosure ? Maybe
'full' is not the best choosen word.. It seems 'full' is limited to
algorithms, and do not extend to secrets (such as passwords), what would
be the use of a safe if the secret (either the code or the key) is
written on the door (I know .. in case of fire, a safe is safer than the
fireman and its water). It looks like computer and military security are
not so different ...I'm continuing to read this paper. Scientific
American / pour la science had an issue on cryptography/computer
security about a year ago (no 36 of the french edition)
Peter Swire wrote:
> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=531782
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists